Sneako
Far-right manosphere livestreamer (∼3M following)
Praised Hitler, denied the gas chambers, and celebrated a “Heil Hitler” anthem with Nazi salutes.
Fresh & Fit “JQ” streams
Jul 2023Broad consensusWhat happened
On the July 2023 Fresh & Fit “Jewish Question” livestreams alongside Nick Fuentes, Sneako justified Nazi book burnings — recasting them as targeting LGBTQ material — and claimed transgender identity was a Jewish invention.
“When there’s photos of the Nazis burning books, it’s books on homosexuality and transgenderism.”
Under each definition
Example 2 (a Jewish-conspiracy claim) plus Nazi apologetics in recasting the book burnings.
Guideline 2 (hidden-conspiracy claim about Jews) and the bar on Nazi-symbol antisemitism.
Conspiratorial, Nazi-apologetic content about Jews; no Israel carve-out applies.
Nothing here concerns Israel.
Who called it antisemitic
Media Matters documented the streams; the ADL catalogues Sneako as a leading manosphere vector for antisemitism.
The defense
Sneako routinely frames such statements as jokes or “performance”; no specific retraction of this episode is documented.
Outcome
A YouTube-hosted clip was removed and Fresh & Fit was later cut from YouTube’s Partner Program; no sanction specific to Sneako.
Hitler praise & gas-chamber denial
2024Broad consensusWhat happened
Through 2024 Sneako praised Hitler (posting his photo with admiring captions and calling the swastika “aesthetically pleasing”), said he was “sick of hearing about the holocaust,” made an “oven” joke to a German guest, and denied the gas chambers — framing it all as “facetious.”
“Why would they have wooden doors in the gas chambers? How do you fit six million people in a gas chamber?”
Under each definition
Example 4 (denying the gas chambers) plus admiration of Nazi symbols and Hitler.
Guideline 5: outright Holocaust denial.
Denialist content about the Holocaust; no Israel dimension.
Not about Israel.
Who called it antisemitic
The ADL, StopAntisemitism, and Media Matters documented the pattern.
The defense
Sneako insists the statements are jokes — “That’s facetious. This is a dead guy.” — though he repeatedly reaffirms them on stream.
Outcome
Part of the basis for repeated bans from YouTube, Twitch, TikTok and Kick for “extreme hateful conduct.”
In their words
Sneako is one of the most prominent vectors for antisemitism, white supremacy, and misogyny in the manosphere, with an audience of millions.
These are 8-, 9-, 10-year-olds. The upper limit is more like 20. We call it the manosphere, but it could more accurately be described as the boyosphere.
That’s facetious. This is a dead guy. The Nazi party’s over.
Miami “Heil Hitler” video & Australia ban
2026Broad consensusWhat happened
In January 2026 Sneako filmed and uploaded footage of a group — with the Tate brothers, Nick Fuentes and Myron Gaines — singing along to Ye’s “Heil Hitler” and making Nazi salutes at a Miami Beach nightclub. In May 2026 Australia deported him and imposed a lifetime visa ban.
Under each definition
Example 4 and Nazi-symbol antisemitism: a “Heil Hitler” singalong with Nazi salutes.
Guideline 5 and the bar on Nazi-symbol antisemitism.
Celebration of Nazism; no Israel dimension.
Not about Israel.
Who called it antisemitic
Miami Beach’s mayor, the Auschwitz Jewish Center Foundation, and Australia’s government condemned him; the club permanently banned the group.
The defense
Sneako stood by the night; on his ban he posted “Thanks for having me Australia.”
Outcome
Vendôme apologized, fired three employees, and permanently banned those involved; Australia imposed a lifetime visa ban in May 2026.
In their words
To chant his name in celebration, raise arms in salute, or treat it as a party anthem mocks the victims and desecrates the memory of the dead. This was not accidental. It was not ironic. It was not misunderstood. It was the deliberate performance of hatred.
There is now a lifetime ban preventing him from ever applying for another visa to Australia. We are a better country when he is somewhere else.
Thanks for having me Australia.
The verdicts above are how each framework would most likely treat this case — illustrative guidance, not official rulings. The 3D test applies only to Israel-related cases, so it reads “N/A” elsewhere. See the Definition tab for each framework’s full text. Inclusion is documentation, not a finding.