The Why Project
← Zionism

Zohran Mamdani

New York State Assemblymember and NYC mayoral candidate; self-described anti-Zionist

Anti-Zionist

A democratic-socialist Muslim politician who has identified as an anti-Zionist, supports the BDS movement, and declines to affirm Israel’s right to exist “as a Jewish state” — while insisting it has a right to exist “as a state with equal rights.” He sits exactly on the boundary the entry maps: he affirms Israel’s existence yet rejects the Jewish-state definition, so under the self-determination lens he reads “no” even though he is not calling for Israel’s disappearance.

What happened

During his 2025 NYC mayoral campaign, Mamdani was repeatedly pressed — in debates and interviews — on whether he believed in Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state. He consistently affirmed a right to exist while declining to endorse its Jewish character, citing opposition to any state with a “hierarchy of citizenship on the basis of religion.”

I believe Israel has the right to exist, as a state with equal rights. (Mamdani, NYC mayoral debate, June 2025)

Under each definition

Self-ID “no” (identifies as anti-Zionist); self-determination “no” (won’t back a Jewish state); settler-colonial “no” (supports BDS, uses the apartheid frame); religious “na.” The nuance: he affirms a right to exist as a state of equal rights.
Self-IDDo they call themselves a Zionist?
Not a Zionist

He has identified as an anti-Zionist.

Self-determinationSupport a Jewish state?
Not a Zionist

He affirms a right to exist but repeatedly declines to support Israel “as a Jewish state,” opposing any religion-based “hierarchy of citizenship.”

Settler-colonialBacks the Jewish-state project?
Not a Zionist

He supports BDS and describes Israeli rule as apartheid — aligned with, not opposed to, the critical frame.

ReligiousA religious/return conception?
N/A

No religious/return conception of Zionism is at issue.

The case that they're a Zionist

Little on the pro-label side: he has identified as an anti-Zionist. The nearest thing is that, unlike eliminationist positions, he affirms Israel’s right to exist and to security under international law — a recognition some Zionists treat as the baseline test.

The case against / their own view

He rejects the Zionist label, supports BDS, has described Israeli conduct as apartheid and genocide, and specifically declines to support Israel “as a Jewish state” — failing the self-determination definition at its core.

In their words

In their own words
I’m not comfortable supporting any state that has a hierarchy of citizenship on the basis of religion or anything else … Equality should be enshrined in every country in the world.
Zohran Mamdani — NYC mayoral candidateZohran Mamdani on Jews, Gaza, Israel and antisemitism (The Forward) →
In their own words
Like all nations, I believe it has a right to exist and a responsibility also to uphold international law.
Zohran Mamdani — on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert”Mamdani Has Long Criticized Israel (New York Times) →
Critic / opponent
Mamdani, we do not need your recognition of the Jewish state… Israel’s Declaration of Independence guaranteed full equality for all its citizens.
Ofir Akunis — Israel’s Consul General in New YorkMamdani says ‘I can’t tell you I support’ Israel as a Jewish state (Times of Israel) →

The verdicts above are how each definition would most likely classify this person — illustrative guidance, not official rulings. The lenses diverge most on the difference between a self-label and a substantive commitment, and between “Zionism” meaning a Jewish homeland versus a Jewish state. See the Definition tab for each definition’s full text. Inclusion is documentation, not a finding.